Urban Green: Innovative Parks for Resurgent Cities

By Peter Harnik

For years American city parks fell into decay as a result of disinvestment, yet as towns started to rebound—and proof of the commercial, cultural, and well-being merits of parks grew— funding in city parks swelled. The U.S. convention of Mayors lately mentioned assembly the turning out to be call for for parks and open area as one of many greatest demanding situations for city leaders this present day. it's now largely agreed that the U.S. wishes an bold and inventive plan to extend city parklands.

Urban eco-friendly explores new and cutting edge methods for “built out” towns so as to add much-needed parks. Peter Harnik first explores the query of why city parkland is required after which seems to be at how you can ascertain how a lot is feasible and the place park funding should still pass. whilst providing the information and examples for parkland, he additionally recommends political practices that support create parks.

The publication bargains many functional strategies, from reusing the land less than defunct factories to sharing schoolyards, from construction trails on deserted tracks to planting neighborhood gardens, from decking parks over highways to permitting extra actions in cemeteries, from disposing of parking plenty to uncovering buried streams, and extra. No procedure on my own is ideal, and every has its personal set of realities. yet jointly they recommend a direction towards making glossy towns extra attractive, extra sociable, extra enjoyable, extra ecologically sound, and extra successful.

Show description

Quick preview of Urban Green: Innovative Parks for Resurgent Cities PDF

Show sample text content

Minneapolis, which, uniquely, has an elected park board and therefore faces street-level, issue-oriented political campaigns approximately parks each years, is additionally finely attuned to resident issues. whilst planners spotted that the majority in their assembly audiences consisted of single-family householders, they instituted a distinct application to distribute upcoming occasion leaflets in multifamily structures, residence by means of condominium. although an additional expense, it was once an attempt to make up for inequities and supply extra stability in park making plans.

Seattle Minneapolis St. Paul Las Vegas Plano Phoenix Portland, Ore. Tampa lengthy seashore Kansas urban, Mo. ny Cincinnati Henderson Aurora, Colo. Virginia seashore Chicago Raleigh San Diego Denver Nashville/Davidson Atlanta Sacramento Dallas San Jose Bakersfield Riverside, Calif. Honolulu/Honolulu County Boston Colorado Springs Tucson Oakland Greensboro, N. C. Anaheim 174 764,976 246,399 588,292 594,210 377,392 277,251 558,880 260,796 1,552,259 550,396 336,823 466,520 475,830 8,310,212 332,458 249,386 311,794 434,743 2,836,658 375,806 1,266,731 588,349 590,807 519,145 460,242 1,266,372 939,899 315,837 294,437 905,034 608,352 376,427 525,529 401,489 247,183 333,249 overall Spending on Parks and sport Spending consistent with Resident $229,205,252 68,808,216 162,812,759 153,820,707 80,668,798 57,363,000 108,179,909 50,419,735 248,996,357 86,650,852 48,471,613 66,780,528 67,561,173 1,177,104,326 46,850,958 33,761,451 42,112,518 56,466,263 358,252,749 47,411,648 156,695,266 71,599,358 67,248,633 59,044,936 52,205,273 141,559,252 100,539,980 33,666,719 30,821,956 92,372,263 61,298,456 34,975,829 48,439,933 36,639,244 22,209,667 27,745,975 $300 279 277 259 214 207 194 193 a hundred and sixty 157 a hundred and forty four 143 142 142 141 one hundred thirty five a hundred thirty five a hundred thirty 126 126 124 122 114 114 113 112 107 107 a hundred and five 102 a hundred and one ninety three ninety two ninety one ninety eighty three endured appendix four  a hundred seventy five inhabitants urban (2007) overall Spending on Parks and game Spending in step with Resident 743,074 747,755 246,407 438,042 279,671 253,152 242,389 1,328,984 285,507 282,114 890,515 248,744 371,038 1,449,634 640,150 424,662 280,135 355,663 681,818 452,933 518,271 953,328 361,420 805,605 311,218 251,247 713,877 470,508 547,274 424,482 3,834,340 795,458 339,555 384,037 916,952 2,208,180 674,028 316,851 606,913 287,245 272,632 $61,604,662 61,385,891 20,082,395 35,137,313 22,197,245 19,215,299 18,343,171 99,632,176 21,368,893 19,484,199 61,363,894 17,096,796 25,416,070 98,705,892 43,230,406 27,566,438 17,969,407 22,362,534 42,357,188 27,526,395 31,382,000 55,641,698 20,532,393 45,553,307 17,179,649 13,858,649 39,237,621 25,171,985 28,720,717 22,228,306 181,577,119 35,532,390 15,059,729 16,705,961 36,500,000 87,457,300 26,291,152 11,923,351 18,612,864 6,600,000 3,203,862 $83 eighty two eighty two eighty seventy nine seventy six seventy six seventy five seventy five sixty nine sixty nine sixty nine sixty eight sixty eight sixty eight sixty five sixty four sixty three sixty two sixty one sixty one fifty eight fifty seven fifty seven fifty five fifty five fifty five fifty three fifty two fifty two forty seven forty five forty four forty four forty forty 39 38 31 23 12 overall and Median $5,729,777,869 $82 Austin Columbus St.

Half long island must were put aside for parkland. the latest efforts to set a customary for the “correct” volume of parkland in a urban have been made in the course of the auspices of the nationwide sport and Park organization in 1971, 1983, and 1995. each entailed nice quantities of work—the 160-page 1995 publication took 3 years to accomplish. regrettably, each one used to be performed in a different type of facts vacuum. whereas the examine execs have been the easiest and brightest within the parks and activity fields, they have been purely modestly attuned to the complexities of city lifestyles.

Until eventually 2009, neither the Board of schooling nor the Fairmount Park fee was once below the keep watch over of the mayor. ) Chicago and big apple are one of the few towns the place, due to mayoral curiosity, a partnership operates effectively among the board of schooling and the dep. of parks. In Chicago, in 1996, Mayor Richard M. Daley, following a profitable pilot software, introduced an formidable aim of changing a hundred asphalt schoolyards into small parks. referred to as the Campus Park application, it concerned the construction of playgrounds, baseball fields, basketball and tennis courts, and working tracks on a complete of a hundred and fifty acres.

2 12. 1 14. 1 sixteen. 1 22. 1 23. 1 24. 1 25. 1 25. 2 That’s really a range You’ve received! (Acres of Parkland in step with 1,000 people)   15 hey Neighbor! (Persons in step with Acre of Parkland)  18 Parks for Daytimers, Too? (Commuters and inhabitants Change)  18 Parkland for individuals (Acres in keeping with 1,000 People)  19 A Park Too some distance? (Maximum Distance Goals)  28 How eco-friendly Is My urban? (Parkland as percent of City)  forty seven the price of paying for Parkland  sixty five Developer Exactions  sixty eight moment Time round (Redevelopment Authority Parks)  seventy one rubbish In, Park Out (Landfill Parks)  ninety one see you later educate, hi path (Rail Trails)  ninety nine “Boulevardozing” Highways (Expressway to Park Conversions)  134 Out of Sight, Out of brain (Parks built Over Highways)  137 don't input (Park Roads Closed to Autos)  one hundred forty four Pavement in Paradise (Parking areas in Parks)  148 dwelling at the area (Population Density round Parks)  153 instructed analyzing  161 Appendix 1 inhabitants Density, greatest towns  a hundred sixty five Appendix 2 Acres of Parkland in line with 1,000 people, greatest towns  168 Appendix three Parkland as a percentage of urban region, greatest towns  171 Appendix four Spending in line with Resident on Parks and activity, greatest towns  174 Index  177 Foreword For urban citizens across the world, public parks carry a distinct position in our hearts.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.88 of 5 – based on 21 votes